<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A coisificaÃ§Ã£o da internet [e nÃ£o sÃ³]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.meira.com/2006/03/20/a-coisificacao-da-internet-e-nao-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.meira.com/2006/03/20/a-coisificacao-da-internet-e-nao-so/</link>
	<description>informaticidade, mais hora, menos hora</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 23:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silvio Meira</title>
		<link>http://blog.meira.com/2006/03/20/a-coisificacao-da-internet-e-nao-so/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Silvio Meira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salu.cesar.org.br/~meirablog/wordpress/?p=35#comment-25</guid>
		<description>julian, thnks for visiting. 

i think the linking between *internet of things*, your work and floridi&#039;s is that he starts from an abstract [and philosophical] definition of infosphere... which goes more or less like... &quot;it is the semantic space constituted by the totality of documents, agents and operations performed by the latter over the former&quot;. certain autonomous docs also act upon themselves, allowing for OO to get into the picture. and much more

in this theoretical setting, further defining information semantically [and orthogonally to shannon] floridi creates a setting where &quot;things&quot; are de facto sources&#124;sinks of information in the infosphere. we are things... but we are agents [can carry ops over docs]... and we are also documents [because we *contain* data].

i think luciano is indeed laying the foundation of what is going to be a new science of information and we&#039;d all benefit a lot by studying his thinking further and closer, cheers, s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>julian, thnks for visiting. </p>
<p>i think the linking between *internet of things*, your work and floridi&#8217;s is that he starts from an abstract [and philosophical] definition of infosphere&#8230; which goes more or less like&#8230; &#8220;it is the semantic space constituted by the totality of documents, agents and operations performed by the latter over the former&#8221;. certain autonomous docs also act upon themselves, allowing for OO to get into the picture. and much more</p>
<p>in this theoretical setting, further defining information semantically [and orthogonally to shannon] floridi creates a setting where &#8220;things&#8221; are de facto sources|sinks of information in the infosphere. we are things&#8230; but we are agents [can carry ops over docs]&#8230; and we are also documents [because we *contain* data].</p>
<p>i think luciano is indeed laying the foundation of what is going to be a new science of information and we&#8217;d all benefit a lot by studying his thinking further and closer, cheers, s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bleecker</title>
		<link>http://blog.meira.com/2006/03/20/a-coisificacao-da-internet-e-nao-so/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Bleecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 20:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://salu.cesar.org.br/~meirablog/wordpress/?p=35#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Thank you for mentioning this essay I wrote. I am not familiar with Floridi&#039;s work â€” but perhaps you can motivate me about the relationship between his essay (which I _just_ downloaded) and mine? Just one or two or three linkages, or how his essay might be knitted into my work.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for mentioning this essay I wrote. I am not familiar with Floridi&#8217;s work â€” but perhaps you can motivate me about the relationship between his essay (which I _just_ downloaded) and mine? Just one or two or three linkages, or how his essay might be knitted into my work.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

